Agronomic, economic and energy performance of imidazolinone-tolerant soybean (with csr1-2 gene)

Giovane Moreno; Leandro Paiola Albrecht; Alfredo Paiola Albrecht; Joel Gustavo Teleken; André Felipe Moreira Silva; Vinicius Gabriel Caneppele Pereira; Fábio dos Santos Biazoto; Tamara Thaís Mundt

doi:10.15361/1984-5529.2022.v50.1403

Autores/as

Giovane Moreno Universidad Federal de Paraná
Leandro Paiola Albrecht Universidade Federal do Paraná
Alfredo Paiola Albrecht Universidade Federal do Paraná
Joel Gustavo Teleken Universidade Federal do Paraná
André Felipe Moreira Silva Crop Science Pesquisa e Consultoria Agronômica
Vinicius Gabriel Caneppele Pereira Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas
Fábio dos Santos Biazoto C.Vale Cooperativa Agroindustrial
Tamara Thaís Mundt Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2022.v50.1403

Palabras clave:

Acetolactato sintasa (ALS), Soja Cultivance®, imazapic/imazapir, aceite de soja, productividad de soja

Resumen

La soja transgénica Cultivance® (CV) es tolerante a los herbicidas de imidazolinona, conferida por el gen csr1-2. Incluso en cultivos tolerantes a herbicidas, se pueden observar efectos negativos en el rendimiento de la planta. En este contexto, el objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el comportamiento agronómico, viabilidad económica, contenido de aceite y balance energético de soja tolerante a imidazolinonas bajo la aplicación de dosis de imazapic + imazapir. La prueba se realizó en un área ubicada en Palotina, estado de Paraná, Brasil, en la temporada 2015-2016. Se utilizó un diseño de bloques al azar, en el cual los tratamientos consistieron en la aplicación de 11 dosis de imazapic + imazapir en postemergencia (V4) de soya. Se evaluó el comportamiento agronómico, la viabilidad económica, el contenido de aceite y el balance energético de la soja. Se observaron disminuciones en el CV del rendimiento de soja a partir de la aplicación de 157,5 + 52,5 g de equivalente ácido (a.e.) ha-1 de imazapic + imazapir. Se observaron efectos negativos sobre otros parámetros para la aplicación de dosis altas. Se encontró una disminución en el beneficio a partir de la dosis 78,75 + 26,25 g a.e. ha-1, disminución del contenido de aceite de 131,25 + 43,75 g e.a., y de 105/35 g e.a. ha-1 se observó un balance energético negativo. La aplicación, en postemergencia de soja (V4), de imazapic + imazapir hasta la dosis máxima recomendada en el prospecto (52,5 + 17,5 g e.a. ha-1) fue segura para plantas de soja tolerantes a imidazolinonas (con gen csr1- 2), en cuanto a desempeño agronómico, contenido de aceite, viabilidad económica y balance energético. Dosis superiores a 52,5 + 17,5 g a.e. ha-1 influyó negativamente en el comportamiento de la soja en uno o más de estos aspectos.

Citas

Albrecht LP, Barbosa AP, Silva AFM, Mendes MA, Albrecht AJP, Ávila MR (2012) RR soybean seed quality after application of glyphosate in different stages of crop development. Revista Brasileira de Sementes 34(3):373-381. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31222012000300003

Biazoto FS, Albrecht LP, Albrecht AJP, Silva AFM, Pereira VGC, Mundt TT, Baccin LC, Mattiuzzi MD, Pertuzati A (2020) Agronomic performance and chlorophyll indices of transgenic soybean (with csr1-2 gene), under imazapic/imazapyr post application. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 57(5):1223-1229. DOI: 10.21162/PAKJAS/20.9821

Cavalcante AK, Sousa LB, Hamawaki OT (2011) Determination and evaluation of oil content in soybean seeds by nuclear magnetic resonance methods and Soxhlet. Bioscience Journal 27(1):8-15.

Centro de Estudos Avançados em Economia Aplicada (CEPEA) (2017) Indicador soja Paraná -CEPEA/ESALQ. http://cepea.esalq.usp.br/soja/?page=351EDias=15#

EFSA, Papadopoulou N, Ramon M (2018) Risk assessment of new sequencing information for genetically modified soybean BPS‐CV 127‐9. EFSA Journal 16(9):e05425. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5425

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2014) Scientific opinion on application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2009‐64) for the placing on the market of herbicide‐tolerant genetically modified soybean BPS‐CV127‐9 for food and feed uses, import and processing under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from BASF Plant Science. EFSA Journal 12(1):3505. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3505

Ferreira DF (2011) Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 35(6):1039-1042. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001

Gazzoni DL, Felici PHN, Machado R, Coronato S, Ralisch R (2005) Balanço energético das culturas de girassol e soja para produção de biodiesel. Biomassa & Energia 2:259-265.

Green JM (2014) Current state of herbicides in herbicide‐resistant crops. Pest Management Science 70(9):1351-1357. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3727

Hess FG, Harris JE, Pendino K, Ponnock K (2010) Imidazolinones. In: Hayes' handbook of pesticide toxicology. Academic Press. p.1853-1863. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374367-1.00086-0

Hungria M, Nakatani AS, Souza RA, Sei FB, Chueire LMO, Arias CA (2015) Impact of the ahas transgene for herbicides resistance on biological nitrogen fixation and yield of soybean. Transgenic Research 24(1):155-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11248-014-9831-y

Martin NB, Serra R, Oliveira MDM, Ângelo JA, Okawa H (1998) Sistema integrado de custos agropecuários - CUSTAGRI. Informações Econômicas 28:7-28. http://www.iea.sp.gov.br/ftpiea/ie/1998/tec1-0198.pdf

Matsunaga M, Bemelmans PF, Toledo PD, Dulley RD, Okawa H, Pedroso IA (1976) Metodologia de custo de produção utilizada pelo IEA. Agricultura em São Paulo 23(1):123-139. http://www.iea.sp.gov.br/ftpiea/rea/tomo1_76/artigo3.pdf

Matte WD, Cavalieri SD, Pereira CS, Ikeda FS, Poltronieri F (2018) Residual activity of [imazapic+imazapyr] applied to imidazolinones resistant soybean on cotton in succession. Planta Daninha 36:e018181240. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582018360100148

Moreno G, Santos VT, Albrecht LP, Cesco VS (2018) Bioenergetics potential of RR2 PRO transgenic soybean subjected to application of herbicides isolated and in combination. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 61:e18000260, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4324-smart-2018000260

Pereira VGC, Albrecht LP, Albrecht AJP, Biazoto FDS, Kosinski R, Bottcher AA, Mattiuzzi MD, Krenchinski FH (2021) Effect of post-emergence applications of imazapyr and imazapic on the growth and grain yield of AHAS-transgene soybean plants. Australian Journal of Crop Science 15(1):164-171. https://doi.org/10.21475/ajcs.21.15.01.2182

Pimentel D, Patzek TW (2005) Ethanol production using corn, switchgrass, and wood; biodiesel production using soybean and sunflower. Natural Resources Research 14(1):65-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-005-4679-8

Riar DS, Norsworthy JK, Steckel LE, Stephenson DO, Eubank TW, Bond J, Scott RC (2013) Adoption of best management practices for herbicide-resistant weeds in midsouthern United States cotton, rice, and soybean. Weed Technology 27(4):788-797. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-13-00087.1

Risoud B (1999) Développement durable et analyse énergétique d'exploitations agricoles. Économie Rurale 252(1)16-27. https://doi.org/10.3406/ecoru.1999.5096

Rodrigues BN, Almeida FS (2018) Guia de herbicidas. Ed. Authors.

Roux F, Matéjicek A, Gasquez J, Reboud X (2005) Dominance variation across six herbicides of the Arabidopsis thaliana csr1‐1 and csr1‐2 resistance alleles. Pest Management Science 61(11):1089-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1089

Sá JM, Urquiaga S, Jantalia CP, Soares LHB, Alves BJR, Boddey RM, ... Vilela L (2013) Energy balance for the production of grain, meat, and biofuel in specialized and mixed agrosystems. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 48(10):1323-1331. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2013001000003

Smyth SJ, Kerr WA, Phillips PW (2015) Global economic, environmental and health benefits from GM crop adoption. Global Food Security 7:24-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.002

Striegel AM, Eskridge KM, Lawrence NC, Knezevic S, Kruger GR, Proctor CA, ... Jhala AJ (2020) Economics of herbicide programs for weed control in conventional, glufosinate, and dicamba/glyphosate-resistant soybean across Nebraska. Agronomy Journal 112(6):5158-5179. https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20427

Swinton SM, Van Deynze B (2017) Hoes to herbicides: economics of evolving weed management in the United States. European Journal of Development Research 29(3):560-574. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-017-0077-4

Zobiole LHS, Oliveira Junior RS, Huber DM, Constantin J, Castro C, Oliveira FA, Oliveira A (2010) Glyphosate reduces shoot concentrations of mineral nutrients in glyphosate-resistant soybeans. Plant and Soil 328(1):57-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0081-3