Performance of different methods to estimate reference evapotranspiration in Cruz Alta - RS

Elisa de Almeida Gollo, Jhosefe Bruning, Adroaldo Dias Robaina, Marcia Xavier Peiter, Taise Cristine Buske, Ricardo Boscaini, Silvana Antunes Rodrigues, Jéssica Dariane Piroli, Pablo Eanes Cocco Rodrigues, Bruna Dalcin Pimenta

Resumo


The objective of this work was to evaluate the performance of different methods to estimate reference evapotran­spiration (ETo) in the municipality of Cruz Alta - RS, using the Penman-Monteith method as standard. Daily mete­orological data were collected from the Automatic Meteorological Station of the National Meteorological Institute (INMET), located in the municipality of Cruz Alta - RS, for a 10-year period. ETo was determined using the meth­ods of Penman-Monteith, Priestley-Taylor, Hargreaves-Samani, Benevides-Lopes and Jensen-Haise, comparing the standard method with the other methods used for three subgroups of data: analysis of the average of 10 years of observations and periods of high and low solar radiation. In order to establish the best methods for estimating ETo, we used: linear regression analysis, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), agree­ment index (d), and performance index (c), with classes established by Camargo and Sentelhas. Among the methods evaluated for the climatic conditions of Cruz Alta - RS, the Priestley-Taylor method is the one that pre­sents the best performance in ETo estimation, followed by the Hargreaves-Samani method, which can be used in daily and annual determinations, and in periods of high solar radiation. Due to the poor performance presented by the Jensen-Haise method, its use is not recommended.


Texto completo:

ARTIGO COMPLETO - FULL TEXT


DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2018v46n3p226-234